Legal Opinion

Estate of Flood

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1941No. Civ. 6539PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment admitting a lost will to probate, and appointing an executor.

Appellant is the widow of the decedent, Emil Flood. By the terms of said will she will receive $1000, plus one-ninth of the residue of the estate. If her husband died intestate, she would succeed to one-half of his property.

The will was admitted to probate under the provisions of section 350 of the Probate Code, which reads in part as follows:

“No will shall be proven as a lost or destroyed will unless proved to have been in existence at the time of the death of the testator, or shown to have been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gorman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Griffiths v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. In Re Estate of JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Griffith v. HiginbotomIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. First Church of Christ v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Killgore's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Radin v. Jewish National FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In Re Estate of MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Estate of RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Welch v. ClampittArizona Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API