Legal Opinion

Love v. Flitcraft

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1907No. Docket No. 89Published

Error to Muskegon; Davis, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Robert Love against Allen J. Mitcraft for work and labor, and materials furnished. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlaie, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant upon the common Counts for $250, claimed to be due him for work, labor, and material furnished in building a boathouse foundation, slip, etc. defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice that the work was performed under a special contract, and that the terms thereof had not been complied with; that he claimed to recoup damages, and also pleaded former recovery. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, by direction of the court, for the full amount of his claim.

It appeared upon the trial of this case that the plaintiff, on the 1st day of August, 1905, caused…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dutton v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Andreas v. School District No. 4Michigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API