Legal Opinion · Dissent

Buie v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 2002No. CA 01-1360Published

1DissentJohn Mauzy Pittman, Judge

The majority opinion turns on facts contained in a posttrial motion from which no appeal was filed. Those facts are not properly before us, and the majority’s erroneous consideration of them has led it to an erroneous result.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of an insurance company with regard to the recission of a fire-insurance policy. The trial court ruled that the insurance company properly rescinded the policy in accordance with a provision stating that the policy was void if the insured concealed or misrepresented a material fact. The attachments to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bushong v. Garman Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Arkansas Kraft Corporation v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Smith v. Rogers Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Dunn v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Calcagno v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API