Wilson v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
We must first determine whether Crews appeals interlocutory orders that are not immediately appealable. “As a general rule, an order compelling discovery is not immediately appealable because it is interlocutory and does not affect a substantial right which would be lost if the ruling is not reviewed before final judgment.” Benfield v. Benfield, 89 N.C. App. 415, 418, 366 S.E.2d 500, 502 (1988); see generally N.C. Gen. Stat. § 5A-24 (1986); G.S. § 7A-27 (1995). Nevertheless,
when a civil litigant is adjudged to be in contempt for failing to comply with an earlier discovery…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Willis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- In Re Contempt Proceeding of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Cochran v. CochranCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Harding v. HardingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Romig v. Jefferson-Pilot Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc. v. JAAAT Technical Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Sen Li v. ZhouCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Sharpe v. WorlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.