Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1996No. COA95-1364PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

We must first determine whether Crews appeals interlocutory orders that are not immediately appealable. “As a general rule, an order compelling discovery is not immediately appealable because it is interlocutory and does not affect a substantial right which would be lost if the ruling is not reviewed before final judgment.” Benfield v. Benfield, 89 N.C. App. 415, 418, 366 S.E.2d 500, 502 (1988); see generally N.C. Gen. Stat. § 5A-24 (1986); G.S. § 7A-27 (1995). Nevertheless,

when a civil litigant is adjudged to be in contempt for failing to comply with an earlier discovery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. In Re Contempt Proceeding of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Cochran v. CochranCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Harding v. HardingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Romig v. Jefferson-Pilot Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc. v. JAAAT Technical Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Sen Li v. ZhouCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  5. Sharpe v. WorlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API