Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1992No. 330PA90Published

1DissentJustice Meyer

First, I dissent because the majority has departed from our established standard of review for Rule 403 rulings by the trial court and has established a new standard. Heretofore, the standard of review of a trial judge’s ruling, as in this case, that the probative value of a particular piece of evidence outweighed any danger of unfair prejudice under Rule 403 had been an abuse of discretion standard. State v. Thompson, 314 N.C. 618, 336 S.E.2d 78 (1985). The majority’s new rule is, “When the intrinsic nature of the evidence itself is such that its probative value is always necessarily…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. People v. OliphantMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API