State v. Purcell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
Defendant contends the trial court committed prejudicial error in refusing to sustain his objections to two questions asked him on cross-examination by the prosecutor. These questions were “You have killed somebody haven’t you, Mr. Purcell?” and “Well, it was known all around town that you killed somebody weren’t it?” We agree with defendant that these questions, in the form in which they were asked, fall outside the scope of our rule allowing cross-examination for purposes of impeachment as to prior specific acts of degrading conduct. We therefore order that defendant receive a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. ShaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. MacCiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. GallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HerbinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.