Finard v. Finard
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtBolster, C. J.
The only standing which the plaintiff can have to claim a review is on the ground that when the judge *256found the claimant’s claim maintained and for that reason discharged the trustee, he made a ruling of law. Such implied rulings, under a line of authorities, are not reviewable. Keohane, Petr., 179 Mass. 69. Richards v. Appley, 187 Mass. 521. New Bedford Cotton Waste Co. v. Eugen C. Andres Co., 258 Mass. 13. Reid v. Doherty, 273 Mass. 388. And while a judge may, he is not obliged, to entertain and report, upon a motion for new trial, requests for rulings which could have been, but were not,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reid v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Loveland v. RandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Mowry v. ToddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- Richards v. AppletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- In re KeohaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.