Legal Opinion

Smith v. Harold's Supermarket, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1984No. WD 34415PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

This is an action to recover damages for wrongful death. The judgment is affirmed.

Prefatory to the recital of pertinent facts and the consideration of the points presented to this court, a few preliminary remarks to identify the parties and to clarify the development of this case are in order at this juncture of this opinion.

Appellant (plaintiff at trial and hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) originated this action for damages based upon a claim for the wrongful death of her son, William L. Halstead, against Harold Nichols and David Nichols, d/b/a Harold’s Supermarket, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. In Interest of ADRSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. State v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Butler v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Ward Ex Rel. Pack v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riddle v. KemnaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. MahurinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. In the Interest of P.A.W. v. A.M.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Missouri Department of Mental Health v. Juvenile OfficerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Donald Riddle v. Michael KemnaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API