Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Robert Conroy, Raymond Dahl, Frederick Jacobs and Walter K. Schubert, United States of America v. Leonard A. Walker, A/K/A "Silver"

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1979No. 77-5436, 77-5444Published

1DissentAlvin B. Rubin, Circuit Judge

I regret that I must differ with my brethren concerning whether the trial judge abused the very wide discretion he is allowed in conducting voir dire. I recognize that some of my colleagues think voir dire is an appropriate adversary function, e. g., United States v. Ledee, 5 Cir. 1977, 549 F.2d 990, 993, cert. denied, 434 U.S. 902, 98 S.Ct. 297, 54 L.Ed.2d 188, and that my brethren on this panel are disposed to leave the question entirely to the discretion of the trial judge. Because, however, of my firm belief in court-conducted voir dire, my dissent on this issue may appear anomalous. For…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. NellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API