Legal Opinion

Anzaldua v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1955No. 18080, 18085PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Appellants have filed a motion to extend the time to file the transcript and statement of facts and appellee resists the motion. We are called upon to read Rule 386, T.R.C.P. That rule requires the appellants to “file the transcript and statement of facts with the clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals within sixty days from the rendition of the final judgment or order overruling motion for new trial- * * The rule also provides that by motion filed within fifteen days after the expiration of such sixty-day period, showing good cause'to have existed within such sixty-day period, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matlock v. MatlockTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Blackman v. Housing Authority of City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Crawford v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Hanna v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Matlock v. MatlockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dellerman v. TragerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Templeton v. Unigard Security Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Briercroft Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Foster Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Embry v. Bel-Aire Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Adams v. HR Management and La Plaza, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API