Quickenden v. Hulbert
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myers
This is an action on three promissory notes. The defendants, it appears, reside in this state and in the county in which the action was instituted.
An amended complaint, which we shall call the complaint, alleges, in the usual form, that, at Carrington, North Dakota, Defendant C. P. Hulbert and his wife, Ina B. Hulbert, executed and delivered to The Farm Mortgage Loan and Trust Company, a corporation, their three promissory notes, running to it. The notes are set out. All of them were executed March 5, 1917. One of them, in the sum of $800, called a principal note, was made payable March 5,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Milsted v. Butte City Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1896
- Ebaugh v. BurnsMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Pengelly v. PeelerMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- Dyer Law & Collection Co. v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- State Ex Rel. Rankin v. American Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nelson v. StukeyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Richardson v. LloydMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. School District No. 17Montana Supreme Court · 1935
- Barrett v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 1960
- Busey v. Harbour-Longmire Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935