Legal Opinion

State v. Haynes

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 2010No. 09-KA-109PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER J. ROTHSCHILD, Judge.

| ^Defendant, Demond A. Haynes, was charged with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, a violation of LSA-R.S. 40:967 A. Defendant pled not guilty at arraignment. On March 13, 2007, the trial court heard and denied defendant’s motions to suppress statement and evidence. Following a jury trial on May 30 and 31, 2007, defendant was found guilty as charged.

Defendant filed a motion for new trial on June 12, 2007 and the motion was denied that day. Defendant was then sentenced to 15 years at hard labor, the first two years to be served without benefit of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DillardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. State v. PaulLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. State v. GirodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. State v. NguyenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. State v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API