Legal Opinion

Government Employees Insurance v. Herring

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff, an insurance company, brought a declaratory judgment proceeding to determine whether it was required by its liability policy to defend its insured, the defendant Herring, in an action brought against him by the other defendant, Shasky. Plaintiff contended it was relieved from its obligation to defend Herring because he had failed to give it notice of the accident with Shasky “as soon as practicable” as required by the policy. Both defendants filed substantially identical answers, which denied failure to give notice and pleaded two affirmative defenses. The first affirmative defense…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Gr. v. District Court of SEC. JDSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. ShaskyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Michael v. PugelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API