Legal Opinion

Ziff v. H. Daroff & Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1947No. Appeal, 232PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Me. Justice Drew,

Morris Ziff, plaintiff, brought this action in assumpsit on a contract of employment, claiming $2,805.28 as the balance of commissions owed to him by defendant, H. Daroff & Sons, Inc., his former employer. Defendant filed a counterclaim averring that on the contrary plaintiff was indebted to it because of overdrawals by him against commissions earned during the course of his employment. At the conclusion of the trial the learned judge directed a verdict for defendant on plaintiff’s claim and for defendant on the counterclaim, assessing damages in the amount of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slonaker v. P. G. Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Hindman v. FarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Beachler v. Mellon-Stuart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Kellett Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. DeMoss v. Beryllium Corp. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Amish Village, Inc. v. Neuber, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1950
  4. Schwartz v. Furman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1955
  5. State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API