Cardinal Petroleum Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES H. O’KEEFE, District Judge.
This began as a quiet-title action on various property interests. Eventually it evolved into a contest over a railway right-of-way strip, or rather minerals beneath it. The issue became: Does the United States own these minerals, or do the adjoining landowners (Appellants) by virtue of being successors in interest to the original homestead patent holders ? The district court, in a memorandum opinion, held that the patents issued did not transfer to the homesteaders the minerals beneath the right-of-way and that they are still owned by the United States subject…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Perry v. ErlingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Zimmerman v. McCurdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Glover v. SwartzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Matthews v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Park District of City of Bismarck v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967