People v. Salazar
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORNELL, Acting P. J.
A jury convicted George Manuel Salazar of carjacking. Salazar claims the trial court erred when it permitted the parties to present additional argument after the jury indicated it was having difficulty reaching a verdict. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
The Charges
The information charged Salazar and codefendant Pedro Vargas Marquez with (1) carjacking, in violation of Penal Code section 215, subdivision (a), 1 and (2) receiving stolen property (the vehicle), in violation of section 496d, subdivision (a). Marquez also was charged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- People v. BeardsleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. BandhauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Ramos CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Sydnor CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Villa v. MattesonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023