Geiermann v. Detroit International Bridge Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
These suits for negligence * travel the precarious border of doubt between jury verdict and instructed verdict. The question, as in scores •of like cases appearing in our reports, is whether .actionable negligence on the part of the defendant may be inferred from the testimony taken below. The trial judge, ruling in negation, granted the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict — made at close of plaintiffs’ case — and entered judgment for defendant. The case is here on plaintiffs’ appeal.
In recent months we have grappled anew with the stated question (see Kaminski v. Grand Trunk W. R. Co.,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Carver v. Detroit & Saline Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davidson v. Baker-Vander Veen Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Patrick v. Pulte-Strang, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967