Legal Opinion

Alonzo v. Rogers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1930No. 21764. En BancPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This is an action to recover damages alleged to have resulted to the plaintiff from the negligence of Dr. Rogers, a dentist, in extracting one of plaintiff’s teeth. The cause was tried to the court and a jury. From judgment entered upon the verdict in favor of plaintiff, the defendants have appealed.

The negligence claimed by respondent is that the appellants caused a hypodermic needle to break and become embedded in respondent’s gum. Respondent alleged:

“That, on or about the 23rd day of May, 1928, the plaintiff submitted himself to the defendants for dental work, and the defendants advised…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Smith v. . McClungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Tennant v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API