Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Scrivens
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Americus—Judge Harper. November 2, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. In a suit against a connecting carrier in interstate commerce, to recover for damage to goods received by it from a preceding carrier and delivered by the connecting carrier at the point of destination in a damaged condition, proof that the goods were delivered in a good condition to the initial carrier raises a presumption that they were received in a good condition by the connecting carrier. There is nothing in the acts of Congress, including the Carmack amendment of June 29, 1906, c. 3591 (34 Stat. 595, U. S. Comp. St. §§ 8604, 8604 aa), fixing the liability of interstate carriers for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Truitt Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Capital City Oil Co. v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Empire Aluminum Corporation v. SS KORENDIJKDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1973
- Rome Electric Inc. v. Railway Express AgencyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Lewis v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922