Buntin v. Rose
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Vigo Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.
Rose sued Buntin for $100, averring that in a settlement theretofore had between the parties a mistake had occurred, to that amount, in carrying forward a certain footing. Answer: first, denial; second, setting up a receipt given upon said settlement; third, that in said settlement a certain other mistake occurred in another item of said account, against the interest of said defendant, to the amount of $139.
The record shows that as to this item there was evidence given to sustain, and to disprove its correctness.
The jury found a general verdict for the plaintiff for $135, being the $100 and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by12 opinions
- Barr v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Reeves v. PloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Maxwell v. BoyneIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Wabash Railroad v. GretzingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. AsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.