Champaine v. Zoning Hearing Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Judge Mencer,
The narrow question raised in this zoning appeal is whether the regular and substantial sale of tack, saddlery, and horse trailers is customarily incidental to the operation of a horse farm. Because the evidence of record does not establish such customary incidence, we reverse the court below.
The appellees, Robert J. Champaine and Royal-wood, Inc., operate a horse farm in a residential district of East Bradford Township, Chester County, which also permits agricultural uses. Their operation entails the buying, selling, boarding, and training of horses. It also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gross v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Bennett v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Fun Bun, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Suhy v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- Farrell v. Worcester Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Town of Avon v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Hess v. Warwick Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Green v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Brown v. Salisbury Township, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.