Legal Opinion
Hasbro, Inc. v. Serafino
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 25, 1997No. Civil Action 95-30062-MAPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review, and without opposition, the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted. The motion for preliminary injunction and attachment are hereby ALLOWED, in part, as set forth at p.27 of the Report and Recommendation.
So ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRE-JUDGMENT ATTACHMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS SERAFINO AND GULLUNI AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS PECKHAM AND GULLUNI
(Docket No. 77).
January 9, 1997
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Hasbro, Inc. (“Hasbro”) has moved for the following…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Bruce W. KEATING, Sr., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Charlesbank Equity Fund II v. Blinds to Go, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. LittleDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- BRT Management LLC v. Malden Storage LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
- Ellicott v. American Capital Energy Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020