Legal Opinion
Dooley v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1936No. 8 Div. 294PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIC.KEN, Presiding Judge.
This appellant was tried and convicted .for the offense of an attempt to commit burglary. The prosecution in the lower court was commenced by an affidavit .of one Tige Latham, the alleged injured party, and the warrant issued thereon.
The testimony adduced upon the trial of this case in the court below was without dispute or conflict. The defendant offered no testimony.
The evidence discloses that on the night of the 4th of June, 1934, the following occurred as shown by the testimony of Tige Latham, the alleged injured party, wherein he stated: “My name is Tige Latham,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Tharpe v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- McDowell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- State v. SchirmerIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Veasey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
- Dooley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936