Legal Opinion

Caffaro v. Romani

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1924No. Docket No. 4962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant Albert Romani from a deficiency judgment against him in a suit to foreclose a mortgage upon certain real property in Alameda County. Romani borrowed money from the plaintiffs and as security executed his promissory note, dated April 16, 1913, and due in two years from date for $1,650, payable to plaintiffs. This note contained the following clause: “If this note is not paid at maturity it is.hereby renewed from year to year at the option of the holders until paid, and during such year the maker shall not have the right to pay the same.”

This note was secured…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. EnrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Kleinsorge v. KleinsorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hasman v. CanmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Morehouse v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. King v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Edwards v. Modoc County BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API