Legal Opinion
United States v. Ruth
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided July 25, 1995No. ARMY 9400093PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GONZALES, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty, by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members, of attempted larceny (thirty-seven specifications), conspiracy to commit larceny, violation of a lawful general regulation, larceny (nine specifications), forgery (thirty-two specifications), and obtaining services by false pretenses, in violation of Articles 80, 81, 92,121, 123, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Jus*731tice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 881, 892, 921, 923, and 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Henry Tamarin, as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Local 100 Vacation Fund v. Adam Caterers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. HouserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. RuthCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. ElmoreNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001