Legal Opinion

Beecham v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1983PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.

This appeal is from an opinion of the Court of Appeals which affirmed an order of the circuit court overruling Beecham’s RCr 11.42 motion to vacate judgment.

The issues presented are that Beeeham was denied due process of law because the trial court failed to appoint counsel to represent him in connection with the RCr 11.42 motion, that it was error to overrule his RCr 11.42 motion because his plea of guilty was not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently made, and that it was error to overrule his motion to vacate judgment without conducting an evidentiary hearing.

Beeeh…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. IveyKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  3. Lynch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  4. Glass v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fraser v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Dillingham v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Rigdon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. TigueKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Smith v. Bear, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API