Legal Opinion

Brazell v. Windsor

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 8, 2009No. 26715Published

1Opinion of the Court

384 S.C. 512 (2009)

682 S.E.2d 824

Cecil BRAZELL and Jackie Brazell, Petitioners,

v.

Audrey B. WINDSOR, Respondent.

No. 26715.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard June 10, 2009.

Decided September 8, 2009.

Rehearing Denied October 7, 2009.

Brian Dumas, of Peake, Fowler & Associates, of Columbia, for Petitioners.

J. Rutledge Young, Jr., Stephen L. Brown, William L. Howard, Sr., and Russell G. Hines, all of Young, Clement, Rivers, of Charleston, for Respondent.

Chief Justice TOAL.

Petitioners filed a breach of contract action against Respondent arising out of a purchase contract for the sale of a home and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ellie, Inc. v. MiccichiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Gentry v. YonceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Rogers v. Salisbury Brick Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. In Re BarbareSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API