Legal Opinion
In Re Invader Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas
Decided March 17, 1987No. 19-10255PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LARRY E. KELLY, Bankruptcy Judge.
Pending before the Court is an Amended Proof of Claim filed by the United States of America for the Department of the Navy (“Navy”) and the Debtor’s Objection thereto.
The Debtor urges this Court to deny the claim as being unreasonable and not setting forth with specific detail any damages or any evidence that would support the liquidation of the Navy’s claim in that amount. The Navy argues that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to entertain the issues raised in the Debtor’s objection to proof of claim. Alternatively, the Navy…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- 8 Collier bankr.cas.2d 186, Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,089, 30 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) 70,845 in the Matter of Gary Aircraft Corporation, Debtor. Gary Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- L.T. Ruth Coal Co. v. Big Sandy Coal & Coke Co. (In Re L.T. Ruth Coal Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1986
- United States v. American Pouch Foods, Inc. (In Re American Pouch Foods, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mintz v. Carlton House Partners, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Matter of American Ship Bldg. Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
- United States Customs Service v. Apex Oil Co. (In Re Apex Oil Co.)District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991
- Plum Run Service Corp. v. United States Department of Navy (In Re Plum Run Service Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994