Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Perlmutter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 1941Published

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover the amount of a deficiency judgment entered after the foreclosure of two mortgages, which action was instituted on permission granted by the court. Judgment dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Leave to maintain such an action is determined by equitable principles. (Matter of Steiner v. Day, 161 App. Div. 742.) The legal representative of Nathan Perlmutter, joint obligor with Sadie Perlmutter, was not a proper party defendant in the foreclosure action, where Nathan Perlmutter died after the commencement of that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. In re the Estate of HornerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. Steiner v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Vernon Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  5. New York Joint Stock Land Bank of Rochester v. Ryan Quarries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API