Legal Opinion · Dissent

Perri Frame v. Millinocket Regional Hospital

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 3, 2013No. Docket Pen-12-322Published

1Dissent

MEAD, J., with whom ALEXANDER, J., joins,

dissenting.

[¶ 28] I respectfully dissent. Although I agree with the Court’s conclusions that there are no substantive differences between the pre-1987 version of the relevant provision of the Maine Health Security Act, 24 M.R.S.A. § 2903 (Supp.1977), and the current version, and as a matter of stare decisis, we are bound by our decision in Paradis v. Webber Hosp., 409 A.2d 672 (Me.1979), I disagree with the Court’s ultimate conclusion that Paradis does not control our decision.

[¶ 29] The Maine Health Security Act (MHSA or Act) became effective in 1977…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Townsend v. Maine Bureau of Public SafetySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Paradis v. Webber HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Michaud v. Northern Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Nuccio v. NuccioSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Stockly v. DoilSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API