Legal Opinion
Carr v. Montgomery County
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 6, 2014No. Civil Action No. H-13-2795Published
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion & Order
GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.
Pending before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. 19). Having considered the motion, response, reply, and all applicable law, defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. 19) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I. Background
Plaintiff Perla Carr’s home was the subject of a narcotics search by Montgomery County Precinct 4 Constable’s Office on September 22, 2011. Dkt. 15-2 at 3. According to plaintiff, officers forced their way into the home without a warrant nor justification for a warrantless search of her home. Id. A laser sight…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.