Legal Opinion
Tae Sook Park v. Bong Kil Shin Mee Sook Shin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 2002No. 01-16805PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Tae Sook Park brought this action against Bong Kil Shin, the Deputy Consul General of the Korean Consulate in San Francisco, and his wife, Mee Sook Shin. Plaintiff alleges several employment-related claims arising from her tenure as the Shins’ domestic servant. The district court ruled that Defendants are entitled to immunity under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Vienna Convention) and dismissed the action. We reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Defendant Bong Kil Shin is the Deputy Consul General of the Republic of Korea Consulate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Estate Of Ferdinand MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Jack Gerritsen v. Consulado General De MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Gerritsen v. De La Madrid HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Mol, Inc. v. The Peoples Republic of BangladeshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Swarna v. Al-AwadiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Rote v. Zel Custom Manufacturing LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Af-Cap Inc. v. Chevron Overseas (Congo) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Nikbin v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Rana v. IslamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.