Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Eureka Springs Sales Co. v. Ward

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 28, 1956No. 5-963Published

1ConcurrenceGeorge Rose Smith, J.

With respect to the two cows transferred to Morris, Justice Robinson and I would rest the decision on a different ground from that adopted by the majority. It is true that one who steals a chattel acquires no title that he can transfer to another, but it is also true that one who obtains property merely by fraud or trick acquires a voidable title that he can pass to an innocent purchaser for value. Pingleton v. Shepherd, 219 Ark. 473, 242 S. W. 2d 971. Morris, however, is not such a purchaser, for he merely credited the value of the cattle upon a pre-existing debt, which does not constitute…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pingleton v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  2. Hamilton v. RankinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API