Legal Opinion

Kaleb Gilvin v. Veneto Tuscan LLC; Karsaz Law; Does 1-10

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 10, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00370Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 KALEB GILVIN, Case No. 2:26-cv-00370-APG-EJY 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. and 7 VENETO TUSCAN LLC; KARSAZ LAW; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DOES 1-10, 8 Defendants. 9 10 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and Expedited 11 Motion for Leave to Supplement the Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(d).1 12 ECF Nos. 26, 57. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in forma pauperis was granted on February 13, 13 2026. ECF No. 5. The Court finds as follows. 14 I. Screening Standard 15 When…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API