Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Dawson Bros. Beaver

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice G-eeeN

This suit, begun before a magistrate, was brought by an employee of a subcontractor against the subcontractor, the general contractor, and the surety on the contract bond, and the surety on the refunding bond of the latter, for work done on a state highway project. Service was not obtained on the general contractor, and there was a nonsuit taken as to it. There was a judgment against the subcontractor and against both sureties by the magistrate. The sureties appealed to the circuit court, and that court dismissed the suit as to them. The employee appealed to the Court of Appeals, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Const. Co. v. HalliburtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Equitable Casualty & Surety Co. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Campbell v. CresapTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heiskell v. H. C. Enterprise, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Heiskell v. H. C. Enterprise, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API