Legal Opinion

Carroll v. American Federation of Musicians of United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 17, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

The plaintiff-orchestra leaders claim that the defendants American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada (“Federation” or “AFM”) and Associated Musicians of Greater New York Local 802 (“Local 802”) have violated the antitrust laws. I have endeavored to categorize the multitude of alleged violations, making a sufficient number of Findings of Fact in each category to adequately define them. I have not found it either necessary or desirable to include every union regulation which might possibly be included in each category. The dispute in this case centers…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. State of Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
  2. Ames v. Associated Musicians of Greater New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Carroll v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF US & CAN.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API