Stark-Romero v. National Railroad Passenger Co.
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs-Intervenors’ Motion to Compel the National Railroad Passenger Company a/k/a Amtrak and BNSF Railway Company to Fully Respond to Discovery, filed June 23, 2011 (Doc. 98). The Court held a hearing on July 14, 2011. The primary issue is whether the Court should compel Defendants The National Railroad Passenger Company (Amtrak) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) to fully and completely respond to the admissions, interrogatories, and requests for production that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pierce County v. GuillenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Odis Robertson v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Harrison v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Rodenbeck v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Powers v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Christopher Cole v. The Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
- Ellenbecker v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
- Gutherless v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
- Gutherless v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021