Legal Opinion

Shroyer v. County of Mecklenburg

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 2002No. COA02-15PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

George and Gail Shroyer (“plaintiffs”) appeal an order granting summary judgment of their claim asserting breach of contract against defendants George Houston (“Houston”) and Connell Mills Partnership (“CMP”). Plaintiffs also appeal an order granting summary judgment on their claims asserting a third-party beneficiary breach of contract and negligence against defendant W.T. Norwood, Inc. (“Norwood”). We affirm the trial court’s orders.

CMP is a real estate developer managed by Houston. In 1990, CMP began development of a subdivision in which plaintiffs eventually built a home. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruce-Terminix Company v. Zurich Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Falk Integrated Technologies, Inc. v. StackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Olympic Products Co. v. Roof Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Gebb v. GebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. White v. Consolidated Planning, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Sellers v. MortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Strickland v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Premier, Inc. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Eckard v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API