Bell BCI Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.1
This case arises from the construction of a laboratory building at the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) in Bethesda, Maryland. Approximately nine months into construction, NIH decided to add a new floor to the building. NIH issued more than 200 contract *619modifications that delayed the completion of the project by 19-1/2 months, and increased the contract price by $21.4 million, or 34 percent. The prime contractor, Bell BCI Company (“Bell”), has received payment for performing most of the changed work, but asserts an impact claim for the cumulative effect…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Melvin Wilner, D/B/A Wilner Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bell Bci Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Bell BCI Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Bell Bci Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Bell Bci Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009