Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Green

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided June 11, 2001No. 00-0268/MCPublished

1DissentGierke, Judge

En route to affirming the decision below in this case, the majority has offended the Due Process Clause of the Constitution, transformed Article 112a into an absolute-liability offense, and modified the test for admissibility of scientific evidence. I believe that the mere presence of a drug metabolite in the body, standing alone, is insufficient to overcome the presumption of innocence. United States v. Bond, 46 MJ 86, 92 (1997) (Gierke, J., dissenting); see United States v. Harper, 22 MJ 157, 163-64 (CMA 1986).

“An inference is ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary’ and thus violates due process…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. FlinchpaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API