Legal Opinion

Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund v. Ortego

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 20, 1985No. 85-C-1155PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Service of process was not valid under the Long Arm Statute. LSA-R.S. 13:3204 provides that a certified copy of the citation and the petition shall be sent to the defendant by registered or certified mail or actually delivered to the defendant. If mailed, the notice must be received by defendant or by a person authorized to receive mail on his behalf.

The librarian here had not been designated to receive mail for the defendant but merely sorted it for the school. Defendant, as far as the record reflects, did not receive the letter and was in fact not even in California when the mailing was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas Organ Co. v. Universal Music Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Howard Ave. Realty Corp. v. McIntoshLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund v. OrtegoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Recreational Properties, Inc., D/B/A Leisure Lakes Resort v. Southwest Mortgage Service Corporation and W.W. (Doc) TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Dukov v. 701 Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Lanier v. McMath Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. A F S LOGISTICS L L C v. M R L HOLDCO INCDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2026
  5. Booker v. ReyesDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API