Legal Opinion

Lanier v. McMath Construction, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 20, 2013No. 1120413PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WISE, Justice.

One of the defendants below, John Robert Lanier, appeals from the denial of his motion to alter, amend, or vacate the judgment pursuant to Rule 59, Ala. R. Civ. P., and for relief from the judgment pursuant to Rule 60, Ala. R. Civ. P. Lanier’s motion was filed after the plaintiff, McMath Construction, Inc., filed a “Notice of Filing of Foreign Judgment” pursuant to the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (“the UEFJA”), § 6-9-230 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

McMath filed an action in the district court of the Parish of St.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Clay v. ClaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  4. Satterfield v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. State v. FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. E.L. v. V.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API