Griffith v. Gulf Refining Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceAlexander, J.
The opinion of the Court is sound in both reason and result. The rule of capture was recognized in Merrill Engineering Company v. Capital National Bank, 192 Miss. 378, 5 So. 2d 666, wherein it was stated that the assignee of a lease covering a tract in a pooled area ‘ ‘ still had the right to drill elsewhere on the pooled area for the second well and for as many other wells as it deemed necessary for the proper development of the area”. So that in the instant case, but for the regulatory orders of the Oil & Gas Board, the appellees could have captured gas from any other separate area of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Japhet v. McRaeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Wettengel v. GormleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Placid Oil Co. v. North Central Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Merrill Engineering Co. v. Capital Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Griffith v. Gulf Refining Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.