State v. Blankenfeld
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentWhite, J.
I cannot agree with the majority’s resolution of the variance issue in this case.
The two statutes at issue, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.07 and 39-669.08 (Reissue 1984), relate to two separate and distinct offenses. See State v. Stabler, 209 Neb. 298, 306 N.W.2d 925 (1981). (Although this court in Stabler dealt with these statutes as they appeared in the reissue of 1978, prior to major legislative revisions in 1982, the premise that these statutes “create separate and distinct offenses” is equally applicable today.) Clearly, § 39-669.07 relates to the crime and penalties for driving under the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. Frankie CrockerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Staci Speidel, A/K/A Rosemary Rojas, and Ervin Everett WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.