Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Blankenfeld

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1988No. 87-784Published

1DissentWhite, J.

I cannot agree with the majority’s resolution of the variance issue in this case.

The two statutes at issue, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.07 and 39-669.08 (Reissue 1984), relate to two separate and distinct offenses. See State v. Stabler, 209 Neb. 298, 306 N.W.2d 925 (1981). (Although this court in Stabler dealt with these statutes as they appeared in the reissue of 1978, prior to major legislative revisions in 1982, the premise that these statutes “create separate and distinct offenses” is equally applicable today.) Clearly, § 39-669.07 relates to the crime and penalties for driving under the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. United States v. Frankie CrockerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Staci Speidel, A/K/A Rosemary Rojas, and Ervin Everett WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API