State v. Steed

Associate Chief Justice LEE,

concurring in part and concurring in the judgment:

T16 I concur in the majority's decision dismissing this matter on mootness grounds, and also in much of its analysis. Specifically, I agrée that Joan Steed's claim does not qualify under the exception to the mootness doctrine because a challenge to the question of the legality of a freeze order is not one of those matters that 'are so "inherently short in duration" that they naturally evade judicial review. Supra 1 1. I also applaud the court's decision to pare back on overbroad dicta in our prior cases in this…