Legal Opinion

United States v. Namrata Patnaik

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 14, 2025No. 23-10043PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-10043 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 5:22-cr-00014- v. BLF-1 5:22-cr-00014- NAMRATA PATNAIK; KARTIKI BLF-2 PAREKH, OPINION Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 10, 2024 San Francisco, California Filed January 14, 2025 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Ronald M. Gould, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Bumatay 2 USA V. PATNAIK…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bryson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Joan McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guntipally v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  2. Texperts, Inc.Board of Immigration Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API