Legal Opinion
United States v. Aliperti
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 4, 1994No. 0:94-cr-00259PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURLEY, District Judge.
In the above-referenced prosecution, each Defendant is charged with conspiracy to obstruct, delay, and affect commerce by extortion, as well as the substantive crime of extortion, pursuant to the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. Defendant Aliperti is also charged with perjury. 18 U.S.C. § 1623(a). Currently before the Court are the following motions for pre-trial relief: (1) motions to dismiss Counts One through Five of the Indictment as “facially insufficient” in that they fail to allege a quid pro quo, or, in the alternative, for a bill of particulars; and (2) motion by…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Benny Smith, Also Known as BennieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Larry Dwight Jaynes and April Marie JaynesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. BenjaminDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- United States v. RuckerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- United States v. RussellDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.