Legal Opinion

Wright v. Schram

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1931No. 27881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action to recover $320 in damages on a claim that defendant withheld from the possession of plaintiff 2,000 bushels of corn which the latter purchased from the former for $1,520. Defendant demurred to the petition. The demurrer was sustained. Plaintiff refused to plead further and the action was dismissed. Plaintiff appealed.

The petition was challenged by the demurrer on the grounds that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that the transaction pleaded was a verbal contract for corn exceeding $500 in value and unenforceable under the statute of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powder River Live Stock Co. v. LambNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Gill v. EagletonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Smith v. AultzNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carlsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Alexanderson v. WessmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Benes v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. H. W. Myers & Son, Inc. v. FelopulosSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  5. Burson v. Whistler's, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API