Legal Opinion

Julius Levin Co. v. Rosenfield

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 25, 1923No. Gen. No. 27,641PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

This cause is now before us on rehearing granted. Upon our original consideration it was decided that the judgment entered by the trial court upon the verdict of a jury should be reversed and the cause remanded, and an opinion stating our reasons therefor was filed.

Counsel for the respective parties have made no objection to the facts as stated in the former opinion, but .. differ much as to the rules of law which should be applied. The undisputed facts to which we are called upon to apply the law are these:

The plaintiff filed a declaration in three counts. The first count charges that on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Opp v. PryorIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Union Trust Co. v. RigdonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Emerson v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Fallon v. FallonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Foss-Schneider Brewing Co. v. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Volk v. KendallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Schaefer v. DippelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  3. Kirchhoff v. RosenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Lockwood v. GuginOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Thorsen v. HansenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API