Legal Opinion
United States v. Young
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 3, 1914No. 2778PublishedCited by 2 opinions
M. C. Young was indicted for using the post office establishment in, furtherance of a scheme to defraud, and demurs to the indicunent.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The defendant in this case, by the in-_ dictment, is charged in substance with—
“having devised and intending to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, * * * and divers other persons to the grand jurors unknown, * * * to obtain from them * * * money by means of divers false and fraudulent pretenses, and to induce the persons intended to be defrauded to give to him, * * * in and by the name of Prof. M. 6. Xoung and The Dr. Young Herb Remedy Co., Incorporated, such money, with the intent on the part of the said defendant to convert the same to his own use, which said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Wallace v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Post v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Newingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- Robins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919